What happens to global warming science when the Earth refuses to warm?
Global warming: Been there, done that. Forward-looking folks are adjusting their fretting machinery now to something called Cycle 25. Button up your overcoats. Ice is on the way.
Global warming, which was mostly a scam invented by researchers looking for government grants, is over. The great warming phenomenon, which was supposed to have sent polar bears to vacation in Miami Beach by now, ended in 1997.
Britain’s Met Office, which tracks weather and makes forecasts, and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit, the source of much global warming research (some of it faked, some of it not), agree, according to the London Daily Mail, that Planet Earth could even be heading for an icy patch “to rival the 70-year temperature drop that saw frost fairs held on the [frozen-over] Thames in the 17th century.” They call this Cycle 25.
The report of the findings in Old Blighty follows an op-ed essay in the Wall Street Journal, signed by 16 eminent scientists, including both physicists and other climate researchers, that the panic promoted over global warming is not now, and never has been, shared by “large numbers of scientists, many very prominent.”
More here… http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/31/pruden-when-the-earth-refuses-to-warm/
“World temperatures may end up a lot cooler than now for 50 years or more. It will take a long battle to convince some climate scientists that the sun is important. It may well be that the sun is going to demonstrate this on its own, without the need for their help.”—Henrik Svensmark, Denmark’s National Space Institute. Mail on Sunday, 29 January 2012
“Nature is about to carry out a very interesting experiment. Ten or 15 years from now, we will be able to determine much better whether the warming of the late 20th Century really was caused by man-made CO2, or by natural variability.”—Pal Brekke, Norwegian Space Centre, Mail on Sunday, 29 January 2012
“If temperatures continue to stay flat or start to cool again, the divergence between the models and recorded data will eventually become so great that the whole scientific community will question the current theories. The real issue is whether the model itself is accurate.”—Nicola Scafetta, Duke University,
It’s already happened.
They changed the name to ‘Climate Change’.
instead of global warming,it could be about the possible freezing or raining in the Sahara,ask the scientists or the weather forecasters,they never get anything wrong.
The US government has spent over $ 79 billion since 1989 on policies related to climate change. Where do we go to get our money back?
Seventy-Nine Billion dollars of Taxpayer money wasted
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/climate_money.html
—————–
They just keep on disseminating falsehoods. The facts mean nothing to them. After all they are the elite. They have the degrees. The rest of us are just peons and expected to eat their feces.
Sponsored Links
- Has the central government made Americans their enemy under the NDAA and Patriot Act?
- Community College summer session?
- Q&A: Can I file my FAFSA to receive loans for this Summer?
- Americans You Voted In 2010 To “Get Government Off Our Backs” Did You Expect them to Crawl into your Vagina?
- Why did Romney, as an after-thought, return to the stage to say he agrees with President Obama…?
- what happens in global warming
- what happens if there is global warming
- what happens when global warming happens
- what happened to global warming 2012
- whats going on with global warming 2012
For the youngins, the upcoming global cooling scare will be a new one.
For us older folks, well now you know why we get so cynical with age. When we start seeing stupid things repeat, it pisses us off.
I agree with what you are saying, it is a very good way to screw people and businesses out of money. It can be proven that the earth has been cooling for the last 15 years, i see now we are talking mini ice age lol, and you dont here these people admitting they were wrong, the whole thing is a scam, the earth has been here for 4.5 billion years and can look after itself, it is farmore likely that weather runs in cycles of time. The earth will be here long after the humans have been shaken from the surface.
Some don’t let a little thing like facts get in the way of their perfectly good story, so it makes no difference for empirical science evidence – only anecdotal and circumstantial evidence.
If you want to read their own words, their intent for the whole issue, read on.
Actually, the whole reason AGW/ACC exists at all, is to get countries to sign the Copenhagen Treaty (like what the AGW/ACC promoters want), to give the UN COP absolute control over the US economy and society (in their own words below). They have drafted a 181 page document outlining that they will have absolute authority unquestioned and unaccountable to no one but themselves (in their own words).
These are a few statements that are legally binding for the countries that surrender their rights to the UN COP. Segments of the expose are shown below, and an expanded expose is at:
http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/images/PDFs/UNFCCC-AWGLCA-objective.pdf
(though not a full list of their demands and aspirations)
(the COP is Conference of Parties, an established organization by the UN for a one world government, and “Convention” is the countries that surrender to the COP through the treaty.)
Page 39, #32
“Funds will be under the control of the COP as the supreme authority of the Convention.”
The COP will have unconditional, unrestricted power over the economy and society. Why is this stated if it is all about science, and nothing to do with a one world government and absolute global rule???
Page 18, #36
“..adoption and carrying out of public policies, as the prevailing instrument, to which the market rules and related dynamics should be subordinate, in order to assure the full, effective and sustained implementation of the Convention.”
Market rules and dynamics subordinate???? This IS what has caused the current global economic meltdown – Market rules and dynamics subordinate.
Page 7, #3
“a major obstacle to efforts to promote [sustainable] economic and social development [and to [reduce] poverty] [eradication] [promote poverty aliviation,] [which are the first and overriding priorities of all developing countries].”
If it about AGW, why is poverty eradication the primary and overriding priority????
Page 18, #38 (a)
” The government will be ruled by the COP”
Does the US want a foreign dictator to have absolute rule over society and the economy???
Page 29, (q)
“Any lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason to postpone or scale down action on adaptation];”
It is suppose to be about irrefutable science. Why would this be stated if there is any lack of certainty? – because it is all about a lack of science certainty for the claim of Global Warming.
Page 78, #4
“economic and social development and poverty eradication are the first and overriding priorities”
Poverty eradication again?? Stated many times. Isn’t this issue about saving the planet??
Page 87, #77
“A separate pool of funding to finance national coordinating bodies through a direct line item in the secretariat’s budget shall be established. Such support shall not be subject to measurement, reporting and verification.”
Poverty eradication is named numerous times. The COP will have absolute and unconditional authority, and billions of US dollars will be extorted to fund their pet projects and no one will know where the billions will go – i.e. Page 87, #77, second sentence – “Such support shall not be subject to measurement, reporting and verification.”
Check out this publication of exposing only a few segments and statements shown in full so there can be no misunderstanding of their intended objectives in the statements and what the sections translate to mean.
http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/images/PDFs/UNFCCC-AWGLCA-objective.pdf
The full 181 page document is at:
http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/awglca7/eng/inf02.pdf
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.pdf
Science and AGW/ACC has nothing to do with the issue. By the way, by 1933 the world was to be in turmoil caused by AGW/ACC according to publications in 1922 –
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/16/you-ask-i-provide-november-2nd-1922-arctic-ocean-getting-warm-seals-vanish-and-icebergs-melt/
http://www.snopes.com/politics/science/globalwarming1922.asp
Is it really about AGW/ACC, or is AGW/ACC an invented issue as a means to an end as they have wanted for the last hundred years????? This will be the result of signing the Copenhagen Treaty, or whatever name they give it at the time.
Let’s see..
The earth’s temp has been rising since @1975 Not exactly warmer every year but over the last 30 years the planet has shown gradual warming.
We are not in a cooling period as you have been deluded to think.
The 16 scientists who signed that report are know deniers and a few are connected to organizations which receive money from big oil.
The Daily Mail should be renamed Enquirer2 Have you actually looked at some of the articles. Their allure to impressionable minds (deniers/warmaphobes) is the sensational headlines and not it’s factual content.
Svensmark??? Here is a PDF discounting the “Cloud Theory” Svnsmark is associated with the Heartland Institute (little more than a big oil puppet)
Grants- Government grants are given out on a daily basis and most of them are not for the study of climate change BUT in order to get a grant, a specific Question is addressed and the method of data collected must be outlined.
it won’t take 15 years for you to realize you were brainwashed to believe the same old denier crap and see for yourself that the planet is warming. Hopefully it won’t take you that long to wake up and shake the clouds out of your noggin.
University of East Anglica is a denier university and likely founded by deniers. Did you know that even the EAU Climate Research Unit there links to the IPCC So here is an excerpt of one of the Study modules for MSc in climate research….
Description: MSWc Climate Change: Physical Science Basis
“Climate change and variability has played a major role in shaping human history and the prospect of a warming world as a result of human activities (global warming) presents society with an increasing challenge over the coming decades.”
OMG a denier link that actually embraces climate change.:)
I was very skeptical of them but it looks like they actually do teach climate change. Aren’t you disappointed to hear that? Apparently it is just the bozos who go astray and want to make a name for themselves, who become the deniers.
You know you’re a denier when …..
You promote a university that actually teaches about human contribution to climate change!! heHe
You provide video links to non-scientists who really have no scientific data to back up their claim
Link to video from one guy who also takes an interest in alien mind control.
Promote the same single petition by the same 16 scientists, some of whom receive funds from big oil
Blame the clouds-which are actually made of primarily of water vapor & CO2 which increases climate change because the contain greenhouse gas.
Claim the Sun is to blame because it is in a warming phase, but it has really been in a cooling phase for a number of years.
You secretly know you are wrong
Believe the Earth can actually refuse to warm,when it is dependent on our taking care of it by reducing CO2 emissions.
Have a warm day
wow
They adjust the Models and Graphs to show it is Warming then collect a few
million for lying .
Historical data from the 1800′s suggest an overall upward curve in global temperatures with short down turns.
Will there ever be enough evidence to convince some scientists or politicians that global warming is for real? Probably not. When seawater levels inundate coastal cities and parts of Antartica begin to show green grass and trees there will still be those that require more data.
“What happens to global warming science when the Earth refuses to warm?” Well, my response is what happens when they are finally proven correct? Will people affected by the climate changes be upset to know that their leaders were warned for decades or centuries and failed to act on the information?
As usual for any such rhetorical conversation, only time will tell.
lol.
Why the Warmons simply say all their hard work is paying off.
so what you are saying is that nasa are lying to us as well mmmmmm how many of you have heard of paranoia
it’s highly unlikely that the minor reduction in solar output will compensate for the increased greenhouse gases. A cooling will not happen
It becomes skewed with ignorant posts about how the greenhouse effect related to CO2 is non-existent, how the world is going to be going into a long term cooling trend, and posts from trolls who think that it’s a huge joke to mess with the minds of the ignorant. Welcome back.